"Hmmm. Is the vast majority of the US population visiting the national parks? Like I suggested previously, "what if" we do the numbers to see what revenues we could extract out of condos in the Grand Canyon. How can we let such an opportunity pass us by?" -Bert I know some don't see the connection between the National Parks and Off-Air analogy, but if you look at a lower level, the analogy is quite fitting. There are deep power struggles here at work. Principles are supposed to rule us, but foundational ethics or morals continue to erode, and therefore, principals are questioned. There are so many power struggles going on, as Craig routinely points to, that we are tearing our media world apart. I have yet another anecdote. We purchased an IPTV system that records and streams media from any modulated signal after demodulating to NTSC for instructional, research and educational purposes. Do you think this falls under all "fair use" laws? Does it apply for Off-Air? For CATV? If so, how many drops must one pay for? I worked very hard to satisfy all companies and entities, private and government, when I specified the system. It seems like as soon as I have everyone on the same page, yet another entity comes in to block our system which only distributes to faculty offices and classrooms. In my opinion, at present, the Off-Air signals are holding up some elemental principals and freedoms of our media use and if we do away with Off-Air, we better come up with some new laws that will bring freedom back to our media consuming society. Just my opinion. Dan P.S.: As soon as you charge for entering a National Park, it is no longer a place for the people but for the privileged. Is this what our park system is to be? I cannot regularly visit my local National Park, Lake Mead, with budgeting for it, even as I am employed. Should the park system be off limits to those who aren't or struggle to make ends meet?