I had written something that might be misinterpreted. > Come now. First of all, the 50 to 100 Mb/s are raw bit rates. The > two-way MAC costs you at least half of that bit rate, making spectral > efficiency much less than it is for DVB or ATSC. What I mean by this is *NOT* that the 54 Mb/s of IEEE 802.11g (for example) is somehow divided up 50 percent for upstream and 50 percent downstream, even if that concept would make any sense in Wi-Fi. What I meant was that the maximum actual bit rate you can cram through a Wi-Fi net is no more than half the advertized "raw" bit rate. Whereas the maximum bit rate you can cram through an Ethernet LAN is more like 98 percent of the raw signaling rate. And ATSC or DVB-T are even more efficient, if you measure the bit rates in the same way. This is because the medium access control protocol designed into Wi-Fi had to take into consideration the considerable vagaries of the wireless links, so that upper layer protocols (e.g. HTTP over TCP/IP) could operate over Wi-Fi more or less the same as they operate over wired networks. This does not come for free. So one ought to wonder, if you want to broadcast TV content on a different frequency band, why you wouldn't at least consider doing so with reasonable efficiency. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.