On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > OK, this was a bit of a mind-bender... > > > On 11/03/2014 15:46, Jonathan Blake wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 5:01 AM, Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> (er) 20tcon 222, 291: [Urquan: These sections weirdly assume that you >>> have >>> used Kai-alchemy at some point which is not true] >>> <http://www.projectaon.org/en/xhtml/lw/20tcon/sect222.htm> >>> <http://www.projectaon.org/en/xhtml/lw/20tcon/sect291.htm> >>> >> >> Ah, when we added 271 back into the game (it was an orphan in the >> original book) we added it to the wrong place. We should have added it >> to 283 instead of 216. I suggest we reverse the related changes we >> made in 216 and add the following in 283: >> >> If you have not yet attained this level of Kai rank and do not possess >> a Rope, but you do possess a Bow, turn to 111. >> >> Also change the last option to the following: >> >> If you have yet to attain this level of Kai rank and possess neither >> of these items, turn instead to 30. >> > > Darn. OK, I've done this, though if you want to double-check the svn > check-in for Book 20 in case I missed something, I'd appreciate it. > > I'm very not following this. Section 111 assumes possession of a Rope. Shouldn't we be putting in "If you have not yet attained this level of Kai rank and do not possess a Rope, but you do possess a Bow, turn to 271."? Ben