[projectaon] Re: Clearing Up a Few Niggles

  • From: Benjamin Krefetz <krefetz@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 14:27:36 -0400

On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> OK, this was a bit of a mind-bender...
>
>
> On 11/03/2014 15:46, Jonathan Blake wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 5:01 AM, Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>  (er) 20tcon 222, 291: [Urquan: These sections weirdly assume that you
>>> have
>>> used Kai-alchemy at some point which is not true]
>>> <http://www.projectaon.org/en/xhtml/lw/20tcon/sect222.htm>
>>> <http://www.projectaon.org/en/xhtml/lw/20tcon/sect291.htm>
>>>
>>
>> Ah, when we added 271 back into the game (it was an orphan in the
>> original book) we added it to the wrong place. We should have added it
>> to 283 instead of 216. I suggest we reverse the related changes we
>> made in 216 and add the following in 283:
>>
>> If you have not yet attained this level of Kai rank and do not possess
>> a Rope, but you do possess a Bow, turn to 111.
>>
>> Also change the last option to the following:
>>
>> If you have yet to attain this level of Kai rank and possess neither
>> of these items, turn instead to 30.
>>
>
> Darn. OK, I've done this, though if you want to double-check the svn
> check-in for Book 20 in case I missed something, I'd appreciate it.
>
>
I'm very not following this.  Section 111 assumes possession of a Rope.
 Shouldn't we be putting in "If you have not yet attained this level of Kai
rank and do not possess a Rope, but you do possess a Bow, turn to 271."?

Ben

Other related posts: