On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Benjamin Krefetz <krefetz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> >> OK, this was a bit of a mind-bender... >> >> >> On 11/03/2014 15:46, Jonathan Blake wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 5:01 AM, Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> (er) 20tcon 222, 291: [Urquan: These sections weirdly assume that you >>>> have >>>> used Kai-alchemy at some point which is not true] >>>> <http://www.projectaon.org/en/xhtml/lw/20tcon/sect222.htm> >>>> <http://www.projectaon.org/en/xhtml/lw/20tcon/sect291.htm> >>> >>> >>> Ah, when we added 271 back into the game (it was an orphan in the >>> original book) we added it to the wrong place. We should have added it >>> to 283 instead of 216. I suggest we reverse the related changes we >>> made in 216 and add the following in 283: >>> >>> If you have not yet attained this level of Kai rank and do not possess >>> a Rope, but you do possess a Bow, turn to 111. >>> >>> Also change the last option to the following: >>> >>> If you have yet to attain this level of Kai rank and possess neither >>> of these items, turn instead to 30. >> >> >> Darn. OK, I've done this, though if you want to double-check the svn >> check-in for Book 20 in case I missed something, I'd appreciate it. >> > > I'm very not following this. Section 111 assumes possession of a Rope. > Shouldn't we be putting in "If you have not yet attained this level of Kai > rank and do not possess a Rope, but you do possess a Bow, turn to 271."? Yes, you're right. Sorry about the copy-paste error. -- Jon ~~~~~~ Manage your subscription at http://www.freelists.org/list/projectaon