[projectaon] Re: <footref> and Re: <bookref>
- From: Jonathan Blake <blake.jon@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:22:03 -0800
On 12/26/05, Thomas Wolmer <angantyr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [ ] Jon - answer more questions about <footref>
>
> There is no end to this... I am trying to script the DTD-related
> updates of the old LW XML files, and noticed that in at least
> 01fftd.xml, the <a class="footnote"> elements sometimes have the text
> that the footnotes concern as content. And looking at the new DTD (and
> through cut-and-paste, my XSL template), <footref> also allows
> content. Is there any particular reason for this? Should there be any
> recommendation to have/not have content?
Your XSL has looked good so far to me after scanning through it.
As a general rule, we should avoid having content within <footref>,
although I would prefer to keep the capability there in the DTD. The
current XSL and your proposal for <footref> both take the possibility
of content into account and place the link after that rendered
content.
--
Jon
Other related posts: