[projectaon] Re: <footref> and Re: <bookref>
- From: Thomas Wolmer <angantyr@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 00:28:47 +0100
2005/12/27, Jonathan Blake <blake.jon@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Your XSL has looked good so far to me after scanning through it.
>
> As a general rule, we should avoid having content within <footref>,
> although I would prefer to keep the capability there in the DTD. The
> current XSL and your proposal for <footref> both take the possibility
> of content into account and place the link after that rendered
> content.
OK! I'll check in updated DTD (with series attribute for <bookref> and
<footref> recommendation) and XSL files as soon as I have tested the
changes.
--
Thomas
Other related posts: