[projectaon] Re: serial comma

  • From: Hooligans in Kilts <hooligans_in_kilts@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 15:48:24 -0700 (PDT)

No, to be truthful, I was never aware that wikipedia was an org site.  I have 
always seen it as a com site.  However, despite that, my main issue with 
wikipedia is that a ton of the information has no sources cited for the 
listing(s).  It is not like there is a division of personnel ensuring the 
accuracy of what people input.  In any event, non of my professors accept 
wikipedia as a valid source of information due to the incosistency and lack of 
cite management.

Ingo Kloecker <projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:  On Friday 04 April 2008, 
Hooligans in Kilts wrote:
> I'm sorry, I have an issue with people who use Wikipedia. If you are
> going to cite a source, how about one that is reliable? Wikipedia is
> barely monitored and anyone can go in and make changes to whatever
> they want to. Use an edu, gov, or a org site if you are going to use
> one. com sites are commercial, and net sites are just domains on a
> network, which can be linked to certain organizations or businesses.

wikipedia.org is an org site, so you seem to contradict yourself. :-)

Or does "org site" mean something other than a website whose domain name 
ends in .org?


Regards,
Ingo

~~~~~~
Manage your subscription at http://www.freelists.org/list/projectaon




       
---------------------------------
You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total 
Access, No Cost.

Other related posts: