[access-uk] Re: RAILCARD SITE AGAIN

  • From: "Ian Macrae" <ian.macrae@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 11:36:06 -0000

Hang on, the guy has taken the point made by me and on this list and is
putting a Word version up there.  

________________________________

From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of andrew shipp
Sent: 07 November 2006 11:30
To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [access-uk] Re: RAILCARD SITE AGAIN


Hi Ian,  Surely this isn't right?  I understood that if you provided a
website for the      general public it had to be made accessible for the
disabled also,  I did receive an application form from the disability
rail card people this morning but it is still in word format which means
that if you cannot fill the form in on the computer you have to get
someone else to do it for you,  there should be no need for this if the
form was on there website and was easier to fill in   it would make
people like myself and others more independent,  what is  so wrong in
this many of us  like our independence as much as we can,  so why should
the ones like myself have to suffer because of these people don't want
to make there site more accessible for us,  especially the application
form.   People like these make me sick just because they are disabled
why should we do this why would they want to travel anywere.

        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Ian Macrae <mailto:ian.macrae@xxxxxxxxx>  
        To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
        Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 11:15 AM
        Subject: [access-uk] RAILCARD SITE AGAIN


        Following my enquiry to ATOC's head of inclusion and
accessibility, here's his response.  I'd asked him to put a text version
of the form up as an alternative to PDF and also wondered why it wasn't
possible to apply online.  He says:

        Ian, I will get a word version of the form organised.  As for
online ren ewals at the moment there is v.low demand for this - but we
are monitoring the situation. At the moment the cost of providing the
facility outweigh the benefits.


        http://www.bbc.co.uk
        This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may
contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless
specifically stated.
        If you have received it in error, please delete it from your
system.
        Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act
in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately.
        Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
        Further communication will signify your consent to this. 


http://www.bbc.co.uk/
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal 
views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on 
it and notify the sender immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to this.
                                        

Other related posts: