[AR] Re: Alternative propulsion was: Flying to Orbit with Hydrogen?

  • From: "Anthony Cesaroni" <anthony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2019 18:45:53 -0500

I concur with your 25% reservation. ðŸ˜Š

 

Best.

 

Anthony J. Cesaroni

President/CEO

Cesaroni Technology/Cesaroni Aerospace

http://www.cesaronitech.com/

(941) 360-3100 x101 Sarasota

(905) 887-2370 x222 Toronto

 

-----Original Message-----
From: arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of 
Henry Spencer
Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2019 6:09 PM
To: Arocket List <arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [AR] Re: Alternative propulsion was: Flying to Orbit with Hydrogen?

 

On Wed, 25 Dec 2019, Anthony Cesaroni wrote:

Henry,

Fission has always be a government controlled and funded energy source. 

It's current limitations and lack of real progress are self-imposed. 

It's broken and can't be fixed in this regard. Blame Leslie Groves and 

his successors.

 

I maybe 75% agree.  My reservations are because, I'd say, given the other 
applications of the technology, a certain amount of government control really 
was inevitable even if the early history had been different.  This applies 
especially strongly to space applications, which have a tendency to want 
(near-)bomb-grade fission fuels.

 

Henry

 

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. arocket
  3. Archive
  4. 12-2019