I'd be interested in seeing some hard numbers; e.g., 285 s @ 1000
psi/14.7 psi, rather than a percentage increase. An increase of 33%
over the 200-220 s of typical hobby-commercial propellants would be
around 280 s; pretty decent but not earth-shaking. 33% over the 265-270
s for a heavily-aluminized, optimized AP propellant would be around 350
s. Impressive indeed; comparable to or better than many liquid
propellant combinations.
Best -- Terry
On 3/20/2019 10:03 PM, anthony@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Increasing impulse by 33% over “traditional propellants” while eliminating HCl is not very difficult. Deploying it is.
Anthony J. Cesaroni
President/CEO
Cesaroni Technology/Cesaroni Aerospace
http://www.cesaronitech.com/
(941) 360-3100 x101 Sarasota
(905) 887-2370 x222 Toronto
*From:*arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> *On Behalf Of *Troy Prideaux
*Sent:* Wednesday, March 20, 2019 8:47 PM
*To:* arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* [AR] Re: New Solid Propellant Company
No idea. Can only speculate – CL-20 based propellant perhaps?
Troy
*From:*arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Charlie Garcia
*Sent:* Thursday, 21 March 2019 11:08 AM
*To:* (AR) ocket List <arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
*Subject:* [AR] New Solid Propellant Company
These folks graced my social media feed today. I recognize some of the names on the team, which is promising. Any speculation on their propellant? HCl exhaust has caused me difficulty with the EHS people in my lab before. It'd be nice to avoid it.
https://www.adranos.com/