You are full of shit, and now you are in my killfile.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 5:22 PM, John Dom <johndom@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Odd to keep adhering to such idea, like a fanatic, again and again! Not the
ancient Clark book nonsense line Spencer clang to I hope? To only claim they
have flown is misleading this list. They most certainly have NEVER flown,
anywhere on this planet. Static tests, yes, several options, but that is
beside the point.
jd
-----Original Message-----
From: arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Ben Brockert
Sent: dinsdag 15 december 2015 23:03
To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [AR] Re: Peroxide/Gasoline Engine
But I thought this topic "has been discussed AD NAUSEAM"?
Non-catalyzed peroxide hydrocarbon engines have flown, but I don't want to be
the one to beat a dead horse.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 4:59 PM, John Dom <johndom@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
No, a catalyst is not required.Oh, is that so, Ben? Your references of anything which ever flew with H2O2,
without a catalyst? VEEERY interesting.
jd