[AR] Re: SV: Re: Nitrating C60
- From: Derek Lyons <fairwater@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 08:50:49 -0700
While funny as heck, that's actually not the one...
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 5:00 AM, Keld Laursen <kl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Some of the story is available here:
> http://www.spacebanter.com/archive/index.php?t-54580.html
>
> From my site, it seems like the original site is gone or unreachable:
> http://www.retro.com/hooocch/acezone.html
>
> /Keld Laursen
> Danish Space Challenge
>
> -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
> Fra: arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] På
> vegne af Jim Davis
> Sendt: 13. marts 2015 12:13
> Til: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Emne: [AR] Re: Nitrating C60
>
> Search for HOOCCH or HOOOCCH or some such. The exact number of Os and Cs
> escapes me.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>> On Mar 13, 2015, at 2:28 AM, Derek Lyons <fairwater@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Dave McMillan <skyefire@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>>
>>> Well, as long as we're talking about purely *theoretical*
>>> fuels.... :)
>>>
>>
>> I wish I could remember the one that George Herbert once proposed - a
>> radioactive monopropellant, IIRC it had a half life of fifteen minutes
>> and was hypergolic with it's daughter product.
>>
>> D.
>>
>
Other related posts: