Ozone-14, O14 has half life 70 s (versus 122 for O15) and is slightly
lighter.
O14 decays via the Beta-plus mechanism to N14, giving NO2 which is known
hypergolic with Ozone.
This was a coproduct of my and John Schilling's imaginations...
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 13, 2015, at 8:54 AM, Jonathan Goff <jongoff@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:jongoff@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
You thinking of Ozone-15?
~Jon
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Derek Lyons <fairwater@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:fairwater@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
While funny as heck, that's actually not the one...
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 5:00 AM, Keld Laursen <kl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:kl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> Some of the story is available here:
> http://www.spacebanter.com/archive/index.php?t-54580.html
>
> From my site, it seems like the original site is gone or
unreachable:
> http://www.retro.com/hooocch/acezone.html
>
> /Keld Laursen
> Danish Space Challenge
>
> -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
> Fra: arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] På
> vegne af Jim Davis
> Sendt: 13. marts 2015 12:13
> Til: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Emne: [AR] Re: Nitrating C60
>
> Search for HOOCCH or HOOOCCH or some such. The exact number of
Os and Cs
> escapes me.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>> On Mar 13, 2015, at 2:28 AM, Derek Lyons <fairwater@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:fairwater@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Dave McMillan
<skyefire@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:skyefire@xxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> wrote:
>>>
>>> Well, as long as we're talking about purely *theoretical*
>>> fuels.... :)
>>>
>>
>> I wish I could remember the one that George Herbert once
proposed - a
>> radioactive monopropellant, IIRC it had a half life of fifteen
minutes
>> and was hypergolic with it's daughter product.
>>
>> D.
>>
>