[AR] Re: SV: Re: Nitrating C60
- From: Jonathan Goff <jongoff@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 09:54:09 -0600
You thinking of Ozone-15?
~Jon
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Derek Lyons <fairwater@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> While funny as heck, that's actually not the one...
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 5:00 AM, Keld Laursen <kl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Some of the story is available here:
> > http://www.spacebanter.com/archive/index.php?t-54580.html
> >
> > From my site, it seems like the original site is gone or unreachable:
> > http://www.retro.com/hooocch/acezone.html
> >
> > /Keld Laursen
> > Danish Space Challenge
> >
> > -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
> > Fra: arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> På
> > vegne af Jim Davis
> > Sendt: 13. marts 2015 12:13
> > Til: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Emne: [AR] Re: Nitrating C60
> >
> > Search for HOOCCH or HOOOCCH or some such. The exact number of Os and Cs
> > escapes me.
> >
> > Sent from my iPad
> >
> >> On Mar 13, 2015, at 2:28 AM, Derek Lyons <fairwater@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Dave McMillan <skyefire@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Well, as long as we're talking about purely *theoretical*
> >>> fuels.... :)
> >>>
> >>
> >> I wish I could remember the one that George Herbert once proposed - a
> >> radioactive monopropellant, IIRC it had a half life of fifteen minutes
> >> and was hypergolic with it's daughter product.
> >>
> >> D.
> >>
> >
>
>
Other related posts: