That's the one! On Mar 13, 2015 5:57 PM, "Jorge R. Frank" <jrfrank@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Think Derek and Jon were remembering this discussion: > > <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.space.tech/MgiA0x5NjxQ/RA93fr7VmTEJ> > > It was about Ozone-15, but looks like you and John Schilling have managed > to make it even more scary since then. > > On 03/13/2015 12:04 PM, George Herbert wrote: > >> >> Ozone-14, O14 has half life 70 s (versus 122 for O15) and is slightly >> lighter. >> >> O14 decays via the Beta-plus mechanism to N14, giving NO2 which is known >> hypergolic with Ozone. >> >> This was a coproduct of my and John Schilling's imaginations... >> >> >> George William Herbert >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Mar 13, 2015, at 8:54 AM, Jonathan Goff <jongoff@xxxxxxxxx >> <mailto:jongoff@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >> >> You thinking of Ozone-15? >>> >>> ~Jon >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Derek Lyons <fairwater@xxxxxxxxx >>> <mailto:fairwater@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>> >>> While funny as heck, that's actually not the one... >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 5:00 AM, Keld Laursen <kl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> <mailto:kl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>> > Some of the story is available here: >>> > http://www.spacebanter.com/archive/index.php?t-54580.html >>> > >>> > From my site, it seems like the original site is gone or >>> unreachable: >>> > http://www.retro.com/hooocch/acezone.html >>> > >>> > /Keld Laursen >>> > Danish Space Challenge >>> > >>> > -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- >>> > Fra: arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> <mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> [mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> <mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] På >>> > vegne af Jim Davis >>> > Sendt: 13. marts 2015 12:13 >>> > Til: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> > Emne: [AR] Re: Nitrating C60 >>> > >>> > Search for HOOCCH or HOOOCCH or some such. The exact number of >>> Os and Cs >>> > escapes me. >>> > >>> > Sent from my iPad >>> > >>> >> On Mar 13, 2015, at 2:28 AM, Derek Lyons <fairwater@xxxxxxxxx >>> <mailto:fairwater@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Dave McMillan >>> <skyefire@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:skyefire@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> >>> > wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Well, as long as we're talking about purely *theoretical* >>> >>> fuels.... :) >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> I wish I could remember the one that George Herbert once >>> proposed - a >>> >> radioactive monopropellant, IIRC it had a half life of fifteen >>> minutes >>> >> and was hypergolic with it's daughter product. >>> >> >>> >> D. >>> >> >>> > >>> >>> >>> > >