[AR] Re: changing hardware (was Re: Re: Re spacex falcon 9 landing)

  • From: David Weinshenker <daze39@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 15:02:00 -0800

On 12/28/2015 01:43 PM, Henry Spencer wrote:

Some things that would have substantially reduced ops costs -- notably,
a switch to nontoxic RCS/OMS propellants -- never made it in, not
because there was any fundamental obstacle, but because it was always
cheaper to carry on with the existing design a little longer.

What sort of alternate propellant system did they have in mind for that?

-dave w



Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. arocket
  3. Archive
  4. 12-2015