Hello Steve (?)
Ty, but keeping costs down by upcycling wherever I can, and I've a half
acre of stuff to upcycle... (Contractor, 37+yrs) I'll go all out with
concrete bunker, if only option, but again, is 5\4" (1.25" builders jargon)
x various widths and lengths not sufficient ? It's nearly steel ! Maybe 2
layers ?I don't need to physically view this test, what with all the video
I've in possession.
Now adding superheated, high psi air (#1 below), into (one) of 4 intakes,
while testing vectoring on the scales. Wrapping .5mm nichrome around extra
length of .06" i.d. aluminum intake line.
Also, moving to perchlorate, rich in aluminum and still acquiring oxidizer
on the way up, at only 35,000psi, or so. O-9978 (no more than that needed,
we think, to attain escape velocity in a 10 lbs payload (GPS, only) . Is
"sounding" correct term ?
I believe, at double choked point, injector location... That pressure will
drop enough to maybe even "pull" in air ?
What is air pressure gonna b@with Mach 59 (lol, sorry, no research done
yet) how to quantify additional needed oxidizer at various heights ??? I
can do variable grains to accommodate...
If always needing a little more oxidizer, to allow aerodynamic thrust
vectoring (passive stabilization, only) then I'll not NOT 180° oppose
intake to injectors. If nil improvement\decrease, then 180° twist is game.
On Wed, Apr 19, 2023, 2:44 AM Uwe Klein <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Am 19.04.23 um 01:23 schrieb Steve Traugott:
Lexan is okay for protecting against
little snafus but in the event of a casing burst it may in fact add to
the high-velocity spiky chunks.
Occasionally I've seen slabs of multilayer armored glass pieces offered
on eBay(DE). rather cheap.
( looked like wrong dimension or optical defect remittants.)
Would somehting like that be useful?
( you'd have to anchor them well! )
Uwe
--
Uwe Klein [mailto:uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Habertwedt 1
D-24376 Groedersby b. Kappeln, GERMANY