On 5 January 2012 10:25, Arun Venkataswamy <arun289 at gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 7:10 AM, Krishnan Sethuraman <
krishnan.ubuntu at gmail.com> wrote:
Can you explain why source code should be released?
Why Not? Apple's app signing is a good example for piracy proof way of
using a AppStore to distribute software. If Ubuntu goes the same way with
its paid apps, why can't MS get a piracy proof method?
I don't think they will. Because to build a Linux version and offer it to
people, they need to release the source code as well. Which they will not
do.
To my knowledge, code signing does not require source code to be
submitted...