[Ilugc] mail server architecture

From: linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
Date: Thu May 18 17:05:14 2006

Mano wrote:

Leaving out arguments about cheap disk space and CPU cycles, it just does
not seem to be an elegant solution. Why is this so? Are there any
hurdles to
the one copy per mail approach - that others know of but Zimbra has
apparently missed!

MS Exchange does it, by the way.

Follow-Ups:
- [Ilugc] mail server architecture
  - From: R.Subramanian (RS)

References:
- [Ilugc] mail server architecture
  - From: Mano
- [Ilugc] mail server architecture
  - From: Binand Sethumadhavan
- [Ilugc] mail server architecture
  - From: Mano

Other related posts:

» [Ilugc] mail server architecture- Mano
» [Ilugc] mail server architecture- Binand Sethumadhavan
» [Ilugc] mail server architecture- Mano
» [Ilugc] mail server architecture - Suresh Ramasubramanian
» [Ilugc] mail server architecture- R.Subramanian (RS)
» [Ilugc] mail server architecture- Suresh Ramasubramanian
» [Ilugc] mail server architecture- Binand Sethumadhavan
» [Ilugc] mail server architecture- Suresh Ramasubramanian
» [Ilugc] mail server architecture- Raja Subramanian
» [Ilugc] mail server architecture- Binand Sethumadhavan
» [Ilugc] mail server architecture- Mano
» [Ilugc] mail server architecture- Raja Subramanian
» [Ilugc] mail server architecture- Mano