[Ilugc] mail server architecture

From: rs2003@xxxxxxxxx (R.Subramanian (RS))
Date: Thu May 18 18:37:35 2006

On 5/18/06, Suresh Ramasubramanian <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Mano wrote:

Leaving out arguments about cheap disk space and CPU cycles, it just

does

not seem to be an elegant solution. Why is this so? Are there any
hurdles to
the one copy per mail approach - that others know of but Zimbra has
apparently missed!

MS Exchange does it, by the way.

search for : Single Instance Message Store

http://www.caldera.com/products/officeserver/oms20/UnixWareOfficeMailTechWP082703.html#s4

Follow-Ups:
- [Ilugc] mail server architecture
  - From: Suresh Ramasubramanian

References:
- [Ilugc] mail server architecture
  - From: Mano
- [Ilugc] mail server architecture
  - From: Binand Sethumadhavan
- [Ilugc] mail server architecture
  - From: Mano
- [Ilugc] mail server architecture
  - From: Suresh Ramasubramanian

Other related posts:

» [Ilugc] mail server architecture- Mano
» [Ilugc] mail server architecture- Binand Sethumadhavan
» [Ilugc] mail server architecture- Mano
» [Ilugc] mail server architecture- Suresh Ramasubramanian
» [Ilugc] mail server architecture - R.Subramanian (RS)
» [Ilugc] mail server architecture- Suresh Ramasubramanian
» [Ilugc] mail server architecture- Binand Sethumadhavan
» [Ilugc] mail server architecture- Suresh Ramasubramanian
» [Ilugc] mail server architecture- Raja Subramanian
» [Ilugc] mail server architecture- Binand Sethumadhavan
» [Ilugc] mail server architecture- Mano
» [Ilugc] mail server architecture- Raja Subramanian
» [Ilugc] mail server architecture- Mano