[opendtv] Re: 4k @ 60 fps encoded into 15 Mbps using HEVC

  • From: Craig Birkmaier <craig@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 08:21:51 -0400

At 7:07 AM -0400 10/23/12, Leonard Caillouet wrote:
It is curious to watch these discussions among highly educated and highly
technical people on this list.  While there is great insight and vision at
times, the discussion often reveals a complete lack of understanding of the
consumer of what those on this list produce.

This has always been the tough part of technical marketing. That is, understanding the ways in which technology can enable markets.

Mark Aitken asked: "Why is CBS (and dragging Sony & others) so adamant about making sure 1080i is included in the upcoming h.265 spec? Is there more than religion at stake here?"

The simple answer is YES.

The MPEG-2 process was corrupted to protect the TV industry from "the next Big Thing." In simple terms, one can define this as the transformation of video from a a highly controlled analog medium, into a form of data that can be managed and shared by the masses.

Interlace was a critical component of MPEG-2 (and then h.264) for three reasons:

1. To protect the (primarily Japanese) investment in interlaced HDTV.

2. To recreate and extend the life of Intellectual Property related to the use of interlace in the standard, and the downstream benefits to the owners of this IP.

3. To preserve a perceived barrier to competition from the IT industry, which identified interlace as a major barrier to the "convergence" of television and computing.

My best guess is that CBS. Sony et al, are trying to get interlace into h.265 for two reasons:

1. To participate in the patent pool;

2. To protect and extend the perceived life of 1080i acquisition and production gear.

Leonard hit the nail on the head with respect to the vision thing.

By the time the U.S. HDTV standard was approved, any technologist worth his or her salt knew that this standard would not be relevant to the future of consumer electronics for very long. In essence the CE industry was trying to manage the future based on a dying business model rooted in scarcity and financial barriers; they incorrectly believed that HDTV would dominate for several more decades.

Instead, a new CE industry has been created based upon easy access to content anywhere, anytime.

REgards
Craig


----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:

- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word 
unsubscribe in the subject line.

Other related posts: