[opendtv] Re: Distribution and Transmission of TV is Going Backwards

  • From: Bob Miller <bob@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 14:20:19 -0400

John Shutt wrote:
I agree except for that time when the viewer decided that quality is 
more important than quantity.  The Internet could be a factor here in 
educating the public by delivering high quality non real time content.

Bob Miller

>Craig,
>
>No matter what compression scheme we use, unless the FCC mandates minimum 
>compression criteria we will always overstress the compression scheme in the 
>quest for delivering ever more content.
>
>All H.264/AVC/MPEG4 will do is allow us to squeeze 8 channels to death 
>instead of 4.
>
>John
>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Craig Birkmaier" <craig@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
>  
>
>>Simply stated, the problem is that the available video compression
>>technology is being misused. For almost every distribution media the
>>system operators are trying to squeeze too much content into too
>>little bandwidth. This is even true for OTA broadcasters, as 19.3
>>Mbps is barely adequate for low stress HD content, and begins to show
>>problems with high stress HD content. If you add multicasting into
>>the equation, something has to give, and picture quality is the
>>victim.
>>    
>>
>
>
> 
> 
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
>
>- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at 
>FreeLists.org 
>
>- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word 
>unsubscribe in the subject line.
>
>
>  
>

 
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:

- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at 
FreeLists.org 

- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word 
unsubscribe in the subject line.

Other related posts: