John Shutt wrote: I agree except for that time when the viewer decided that quality is more important than quantity. The Internet could be a factor here in educating the public by delivering high quality non real time content. Bob Miller >Craig, > >No matter what compression scheme we use, unless the FCC mandates minimum >compression criteria we will always overstress the compression scheme in the >quest for delivering ever more content. > >All H.264/AVC/MPEG4 will do is allow us to squeeze 8 channels to death >instead of 4. > >John > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Craig Birkmaier" <craig@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > >>Simply stated, the problem is that the available video compression >>technology is being misused. For almost every distribution media the >>system operators are trying to squeeze too much content into too >>little bandwidth. This is even true for OTA broadcasters, as 19.3 >>Mbps is barely adequate for low stress HD content, and begins to show >>problems with high stress HD content. If you add multicasting into >>the equation, something has to give, and picture quality is the >>victim. >> >> > > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: > >- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at >FreeLists.org > >- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word >unsubscribe in the subject line. > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.