Ian Mackenzie wrote: > Why put an "Earth Scorcher" in a remote location to cover a population > density that probably meant 10 watts or more per viewer when a COFDM > SFN transmitter nearby will give better coverage. > The use of "Gap Fillers" or on-channel repeaters allows a much better > way of covering vast areas efficiently. > In Australia we have areas with far fewer people per square mile than > the USA and guess what? They all can get network HDTV.=20 > Some get it from high power stations just like ATSC. > Some get it from COFDM SFN transmitters. > Some get it from gap fillers as is common in Spain and other=20 > European countries. > And some can get it by satellite where as a last resort where the cost > of installing and running a transmitter in to serve maybe ten people=20 > in an area of thousands of square miles would not be feasible > with any transmission system. > I just thought the above was worth separating and repeating for future quotes. - Tom > =20 > > Stephen W. Long wrote: > > Doug is still missing the point. With COFDM you can implement Single > Frequency Networks, using much lower power transmitters in locations > much closer to the actual consumers/viewers. 8VSB requires big stick > mentality, since it does not do SFN (as part of its primary business > activities). I would assert that a COFDM system would provide HIGHER > signal to noise than 8VSB because the transmitters could be located > where the people are. > > This is where Doug doesn't understand what COFDM is all about. > Why put an "Earth Scorcher" in a remote location to cover a population > density that probably meant 10 watts or more per viewer when a COFDM > SFN transmitter nearby will give better coverage. > The use of "Gap Fillers" or on-channel repeaters allows a much better > way of covering vast areas efficiently. > In Australia we have areas with far fewer people per square mile than > the USA and guess what? They all can get network HDTV.=20 > Some get it from high power stations just like ATSC. > Some get it from COFDM SFN transmitters. > Some get it from gap fillers as is common in Spain and other=20 > European countries. > And some can get it by satellite where as a last resort where the cost > of installing and running a transmitter in to serve maybe ten people=20 > in an area of thousands of square miles would not be feasible > with any transmission system. > > Also, I have yet to hear any meaningful conversation about the wasted > bandwidth (wasted channels) required by 8VSB to support translators in > remote areas (following the current analog model of a big stick with > remote translators on separate frequencies). With COFDM, a television > station could transmit using their big stick and then have their > repeaters (not translators now) use the same frequency. Here in the > Washington Metro Area, all of the PBS stations (Maryland Public TV, > etc.) that have several translators, could sit on a single frequency > (and also improve channel identification). > > In rural America, where does the wasted bandwidth required for different > frequencies for 8VSB and translators get calculated in the bit per Hertz > calculation? > > Stephen Long > > At 12:12 PM 2/13/2006 -0600, Doug McDonald wrote: > >>Craig Birkmaier wrote: >> >>>At 12:02 PM -0600 2/12/06, Doug McDonald wrote: >>> >>>>I have to use three different indoor antennas where I live to get=20 >>>>all stations. ... >>> >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> >>>>And WHY won't one antenna work without repointing? >>>> >>>>I have something most people don't, which I installed in order to=20 >>>>have a real, honest, statement such as the following, and that=20 >>>>something is a spectrum analyzer. >>> >>>=20 >>>You have something elsse that the typical consumer does not have: >>>=20 >>>The equipment and ability to screw around with this stuff. >>>=20 >>>What you have described above is one of MANY reasons that ATSC=20 >>>broadcasting has been stillborn in the U.S. >>>=20 >> >>BUT .... since the problem is NOT MULTIPATH, but rather just signal=20 >>level ... COFDM would have the exact same problems at a lower bitrate,=20 >>and worse problems at the same bitrate!!! >> >> >> >>>It is absurd to believe that U.S> television broadcasters can survive > > >>>with the current business model and a retro transmission technology=20 >>>that does not work as well as the system that is being replaced=20 >>>(which did not work well either). >>>=20 >> >> >>But COFDM is no better, unless absolutely vast amounts of additional=20 >>money are spent to generate a much higher signal level, over the WHOLE=20 >>service area, in other words, vast amounts for a true SFN. >> >>I suspect, Craig, that you and all others are proposing to=20 >>"cherry-pick" only large metropolitan areas, and to hell with far=20 >>suburbs and rural areas. >> >>Doug McDonald >>=20 >>=20 >>---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: >> >>- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at > > FreeLists.org=20 > >>- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word > > unsubscribe in the subject line. > >> > =20 > =20 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: > > - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at > FreeLists.org=20 > > - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word > unsubscribe in the subject line. > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: > > - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at > FreeLists.org > > - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word > unsubscribe in the subject line. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.