This is the declaration by telco CEO Edward Whitacre that kicked off the net neutrality debate: http://www.businessweek.com/@@n34h*IUQu7KtOwgA/magazine/content/05_45/b3958092.htm Q: How concerned are you about Internet upstarts like Google (GOOG ), MSN, Vonage, and others? A: How do you think they're going to get to customers? Through a broadband pipe. Cable companies have them. We have them. Now what they would like to do is use my pipes free, but I ain't going to let them do that because we have spent this capital and we have to have a return on it. So there's going to have to be some mechanism for these people who use these pipes to pay for the portion they're using. Why should they be allowed to use my pipes? The Internet can't be free in that sense, because we and the cable companies have made an investment and for a Google or Yahoo! (YHOO ) or Vonage or anybody to expect to use these pipes [for] free is nuts! --- Now this was mostly fantasy, since even the largest telco/cableco doesn't have sufficient market power to get away with extortion (after a few more mergers, they might). But you can't blame regulators for acting, since the telcos are openly boasting of their ability and willingness to engage in anti-competitive/monopolistic practices. They asked for it, and they're getting it. Nobody should have any sympathy. By the way, hardware companies like Intel that are pro-Internet and generally opposed to telco regulation are pro-net-neutrality. It's not just content providers that want net neutrality; almost everyone does. The only issue is whether competition will naturally restrain the worst impulses of telco CEOs, in which case regulation is unneccesary (but harmless). Dan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.