How do you KNOW the receivers were tested in exactly the same way with the exact same test equipment under exactly the same conditions? YOU DON'T!!!!!!! > Cliff Benham wrote: > > > After 40 plus years in broadcast engineering I can > > assure you it is impossible to judge the performance of > > *anything* by it's spec sheet or sales brochure. > > Hmmm. > > Since all I have done is quote directly out of CRC test > results, and you quoted my post, am I to conclude that > the Communications Research Centre of Canada in fact > only writes sales brochures? > > > Direct comparison under identical test conditions is the > > *only* way to know which device works best. > > Not wanting to sound overly pedantic here, but ... > > When an engineer designs something, he has to use both > measurements and real-world tests. The measurements are > needed to associate behavior in the real world with > specific aspects of the design. It is only with these > measurements, and associated real-world tests, that an > engineer can go back and tweak the design in a attempt > to affect real-world behavior. Otherwise, he's just > shooting in the dark. > > The example of the comparative results of the newer > receivers in Mark Schubin's apartment are a good case in > point. The one which was most successful was one that did > not measure best in equalizer performance, with respect > to both static or dynamic echo. This leads to the > conclusion, at least in *that* site, that equalizer > performance was adequate "as is" with the LG, and that it > must have been other aspects of the design which made it > particularly successful. > > This conclusion was further supported by the results with > the LG clones, which used the same equalizer as the LG > prototype and yet got results more similar to those of > the other, less successful contestants. Good, not great. > > Furthermore: > > The LG did not test as well as A/74 guidelines. Therefore, > one can conclude that A/74 guidelines with respect to > echo tolerance *per se* are probably more than adequate, > but that A/74 guidelines *may* not adequately address other > aspects of receiver design. And that these other aspects > have an important impact on real world performance. > > This was the gist of the post you quoted. Sales brochures > have never been the issue in any of this, at least not > from my posts. > > Bert > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: > > - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at > FreeLists.org > > - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word > unsubscribe in the subject line. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.