Dan Grimes wrote: > So the point I was making when I said "what is wrong" is that one can > get video to multiple devices (computers, gaming, handhelds, etc.) by > doing things a few ways: > > 1. Transcode it into a bunch of different file types and have the > customer pick. > > 2. Pay a bunch of money to a service that can transcode and serve it, > for which there are only a few. They know it and make you pay the > premium. > > 3. Be a software engineer with some very special knowledge (like Kon) > to build your website and delivery platforms. > > And each of those solve your problem for today, for tomorrow it will > all change! I suppose it needs to be this way and always will, lest > someone get more money than someone else. Of course, Dan! It's a racket. And only those who stand to benefit from it, i.e. certainly not the consumer, can possibly rave about this state of affairs. This is why the ATSC and DVB-T set standards. It's exactly to avoid this sort of mess. And that's why I have always found anyone claiming "we don't need any standards" to be amazingly naïve. Yes, the Internet Protocol can support any number of layer 5 and above standards to run on it. But so can ATSC's and DVB-T's link layers. Just because you can support multiple standards does not mean that doing so makes any rationale sense. For one thing, it seems kinda obvious that if there were a coherent set of standards, you'd be more successful marketing hardware accelerators that always work. Wouldn't that have been a perfectly good way to get Flash (or you pick any viable option that actually exists and is widely deployed already) to work on handheld appliances, for example? Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.