[projectaon] Re: 28thos errata
- From: Benjamin Krefetz <krefetz@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 08:48:41 -0500
I'm looking in http://www.projectaon.org/test/en/xhtml/lw/28thos/ and not
seeing these changes reflected. Have they not been uploaded to the test
area yet, or is there somewhere else I should be looking?
Ben
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> On 28/02/2014 22:10, Simon Osborne wrote:
>
>> On 28/02/2014 00:18, Jonathan Blake wrote:
>>
>>> (er) 18: one of the two remaining monsters -> one of the
>>> monsters [lm: There are still three of them on this path]
>>>
>>> Agreed.
>>>
>>
>> Resolved--a nice easy one.
>>
>
> Or maybe it wasn't.
>
>
> Jon Blake wrote:
>
>> I don't remember any of the monsters having been killed in sections
>> 109 and 18. Are we assuming that one may have been? Did I miss
>> something?
>>
>
> Good point. OK, also removed the word 'remaining'.
>
>
>
> (er) 22: Halt Missile [lm: The spell described in this section
>>> is Invisible Shield]
>>>
>>> If we switch this to Invisible Shield, then we should also be able to
>>> do the following:
>>>
>>> (er) 92: Kai-alchemy and have attained the rank of Sun Knight, ->
>>> Kai-alchemy,
>>>
>>> The other alternative for 22 is to change the description of what
>>> happens to match the description of Halt Missile which "causes any
>>> projected or hurled missile ... to cease its flight and remain
>>> stationary in mid-air."
>>>
>>> Also related:
>>>
>>> (??) 215: Invisible Shield -> Shield
>>>
>>> Shield is the Old Kingdom version of Invisible Shield.
>>>
>>
>> Er, if I understand correctly, the changes to 22 and 92 change the least
>> and are therefore the most desirable. I vote for those.
>>
>> Irrespective of what we decide, the proposed change definitely needs to
>> be made to 215. Right? Magi-magic vs. Kai-alchemy is not one of my
>> specialities! ;-)
>>
>
> OK, made those changes, with the following amendments:
>
> * In Section 92, I replaced 'and have attained the Kai rank of Sun Knight'
> with 'and wish to use it' as it is not a compulsory option.
>
> * Also in Section 92 , I deleted the phrase 'or if you have yet to attain
> the required level of Kai mastery' as it is no longer relevant.
>
> Explanation and reasoning is briefly covered in the Errata entry for
> Section 92.
>
>
> --
> Simon Osborne
> Project Aon
>
> ~~~~~~
> Manage your subscription at http://www.freelists.org/list/projectaon
>
>
>
Other related posts: