Great! This will require you re-making the Action Chart graphics for
each book...Once they're committed to svn I'll get to work on updating
the text of the books. :-)
--
Simon Osborne
Project Aon
On 26/04/2016 22:59, Jonathan Blake wrote:
It looks like I failed to respond to this. Sorry. :( I'm OK increasing
the initial disciplines to five.
Jon
On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 at 04:06 Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Hi Jon
The revised progression would be as follows:
Book 21 = 5/16 <--- Start with this # Disciplines
Book 22 = 6/16
Book 23 = 7/16
Book 24 = 8/16
Book 25 = 9/16
Book 26 = 10/16
Book 27 = 11/16
Book 28 = 12/16
Book 29 = 13/16
Book 30 = 14/16
Book 31 = 15/16
Book 32 = 16/16
So you will start Book 32 with all Disciplines...unless my very hazy
recollection of Joe's comments re: Books 31+32 being a two-parter is
true, or if the rules for Book 32 say you are allowed to have all
Disciplines in Book 32, either of which seems to be the case in view of
the change from 4 -> 5 starting Disciplines.
The proposed change mainly nixes the strange issue in the Red Fox
editions on the Levels of Kai Mastery section whereby you would seem to
attain the rank of Kai Supreme Master having mastered only 15/16
Disciplines (thus our current footnote).
--
Simon Osborne
Project Aon
On 08-Apr-16 9:48 PM, Jonathan Blake wrote:
> Did I miss something? :) What - other than increasing the initial
> Disciplines to five - are the indications that the NO Grand Master
> will be a Supreme Master for book 32?
>
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 7:44 AM, Simon Osborne
<outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>> Yeah, that's definitely worth bearing in mind.
>>
>> It does seem to be in harmony with the indications in the rules
that the NO
>> will be Level 12 (Kai Supreme Master) when playing Book 32,
though. As it
>> stands in the PA editions, in Book 32 you will be a Kai Supreme
Master but
>> only have mastered 15/16 Disciplines. This change rectifies the
discrepancy,
>> and I seem to remember that Books 31/32 were supposed to be a bit
like Book
>> 5 (1 adventure in 2 halves), though I can't find a quote to hand
right now.
>> If so, maybe the rules are that you won't pick a new (the final!)
Discipline
>> between Books 31 and 32.
>>
>> --
>> Simon Osborne
>> Project Aon
>>
>> On 06-Apr-16 3:22 PM, Benjamin Krefetz wrote:
>>>
>>> The only problem with this is if Joe finally gets out Books
29-32, by
>>> book 32 a player who's played straight through from Book 21 will
have
>>> all 16 disciplines. I wonder if this is a sign that Joe's now
planning
>>> to stop at 31.
>>>
>>> Ben
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Simon Osborne
<outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> <mailto:outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx>>>
wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all
>>>
>>> Further to the outstanding Book 24 issues, a thread on the
forum
>>>
>>>
<http://projectaon.proboards.com/thread/2598/initial-gm-disciplines-book-21>
>>> has pointed out that in the CE of the NO books, you start with
>>> *five* rather than four NO Disciplines, which makes much
more sense
>>> and would allow us to kill a footnote in each of the NO
books in the
>>> PA editions.
>>>
>>> Changes required would be:
>>>
>>> (er) 21votm Disciplines: <em>four</em> -> <em>five</em>
>>>
>>> (ne) 21votm Levels: [so: kill footnote--also in Books 22-28]
>>>
>>> I recommend we implement this improvement in the PA
editions. Are
>>> there any other places that require amendment to bring this
into line?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Simon Osborne
>>> Project Aon