[projectaon] Re: Some dabbling with 01HH + misc files
- From: Thomas Wolmer <angantyr@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 12:50:24 +0100
[ ] Jon - clarify the intentions with <footref> and <bookref>
2005/12/22, Thomas Wolmer <angantyr@xxxxxxxxx>:
> 2005/12/21, Iain Smith <iainsmith@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > Are you sure? I tried changing the footnote markers inside the paragraph
> > text to use
> > <footref> as you suggested, however the produced HTML pages no longer
> > contain the
> > footnote link.
> >
> > I've not read the whole DTD, but in the region around line 490 it still
> > refers to the
> > need for an <a> section within the paragraph text.
> >
> > Maybe the XSL isn't ready to accept the changes referred to in the DTD, or
> > did I just
> > misunderstand what you were trying to say?
>
> Hm, I went by what I read in the DTD. I would guess that the XSL is
> not ready... no, I claim to know that the XSL is not ready, as it does
> not handle the footref element at all. I wonder if the intention was
> to treat the <footref>s exactly as the existing <a>nchors, or in some
> other way?
I also noticed that the <bookref> element is not supported by the XSL
either. Am I right in assuming that <bookref book="$book"
section="$section">blah blah text</bookref> shall be transformed into
<a href="../../$series/$book/$section.htm">blah blah text</a>, where
$series is always the same as for the book you are transforming and
$section defaults to "title" if it's left out?
--
Thomas
Other related posts: