On 12/21/05, Thomas Wolmer <angantyr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > [ ] Jon - clarify the intentions with <footref> > Hm, I went by what I read in the DTD. I would guess that the XSL is > not ready... no, I claim to know that the XSL is not ready, as it does > not handle the footref element at all. I wonder if the intention was > to treat the <footref>s exactly as the existing <a>nchors, or in some > other way? Sorry for the silence. Holiday duties and helping Raul have been keeping me busy. He has a preliminary page uploaded, BTW: http://www.projectaon.org/es/ The <footref> element is intended to function exactly like the existing anchors, yes. -- Jon