[AR] Re: SSTO

  • From: Rand Simberg <simberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 09:21:06 -0800

I think the question is less whether it is achievable than whether it is useful. The off-nominal performance is terrible, and I think that SpaceX has demonstrated that staging concerns are overstated. If BFR happens, I think it would be very tough to beat it with an SSTO in terms of mission flexibility.

On 2018-02-10 09:01, William Claybaugh wrote:

Dr. Shilling’s comments on SSTO got me thinking about Have Region,
DC-X, and X-33.

Technology is now about 20 years further down the road; is chemical
rocket reusable SSTO now achievable?

What is different?

Bill

  • References:

Other related posts: