[AR] Re: dynamic stability

  • From: "Richard Hagensick" <r.hagensick@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 20:30:37 -0500

If you belong to Tripoli Rocketry they have a Class 3 committee that will do 
the analysis for you and provide you with the paperwork you need to file your 
permit.  They use Rocksim Pro.  I submitted mine to the FAA for a 150K launch 
at BALLS this year.

Richard Hagensick

-----Original Message-----
From: arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Monroe L. King Jr.
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 7:44 PM
To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [AR] Re: dynamic stability

 I don't think Flowmetrics flies under a TRA waiver for starters. The one 
launch I observed was an atlas vernier modification LOX and Hydrocarbon at FAR

 As I understand it Class 3 is "P" and above and you can bet they want a FULL 3 
Sigma 6 degree of freedom analysis. 

 AT a TRA event such as BALLS if you within a certain amount of their standing 
waiver for altitude you might get some benefit. But they are still going to 
require 3 sigma analysis (although you might get some help with it) and they 
in-turn are going to hand that to the FAA.

 Last I remember it's 14 points they look at during the analysis I have a list 
here somewhere.

Monroe     

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [AR] Re: dynamic stability
> From: Carl Tedesco <ctedesco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, August 20, 2014 5:24 pm
> To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> That is what I wondered. From an aerospace engineering point of view, 
> dynamic stability  looks to see how a rocket will respond when a 
> disturbance is imparted on it. CP/CG rules determine static stability, 
> albeit still important. So, the Tripoli example you mention suggests 
> that they just want to know how  the CP and CG change throughout the 
> entire flight?
> 
> Monroe, do they require they require 3-sigma or dispersion analysis? 
> Below is an excerpt of what I was emailed (looks like it was cut & 
> pasted from the FAA website).
> 
> (a) Class 2---High-Power Rockets. When a Class 2---High-Power Rocket 
> requires a certificate of waiver or authorization, the person planning 
> the operation must provide the information below on each type of 
> rocket to the FAA at least 45 days before the proposed operation. The 
> FAA may request additional information if necessary to ensure the 
> proposed operations can be safely conducted. The information shall 
> include for each type of Class 2 rocket expected to be flown:
> (1) Estimated number of rockets,
> (2) Type of propulsion (liquid or solid), fuel(s) and oxidizer(s),
> (3) Description of the launcher(s) planned to be used, including any 
> airborne platform(s),
> (4) Description of recovery system,
> (5) Highest altitude, above ground level, expected to be reached,
> (6) Launch site latitude, longitude, and elevation, and
> (7) Any additional safety procedures that will be followed.
> (b) Class 3---Advanced High-Power Rockets. When a Class 3---Advanced 
> High-Power Rocket requires a certificate of waiver or authorization 
> the person planning the operation must provide the information below 
> for each type of rocket to the FAA at least 45 days before the 
> proposed operation. The FAA may request additional information if 
> necessary to ensure the proposed operations can be safely conducted. 
> The information shall include for each type of Class 3 rocket expected to be 
> flown:
> (1) The information requirements of paragraph (a) of this section,
> (2) Maximum possible range,
> (3) The dynamic stability characteristics for the entire flight 
> profile,
> (4) A description of all major rocket systems, including structural, 
> pneumatic, propellant, propulsion, ignition, electrical, avionics, 
> recovery, wind-weighting, flight control, and tracking,
> (5) A description of other support equipment necessary for a safe 
> operation,
> (6) The planned flight profile and sequence of events,
> (7) All nominal impact areas, including those for any spent motors and 
> other discarded hardware, within three standard deviations of the mean 
> impact point,
> (8) Launch commit criteria,
> (9) Countdown procedures, and
> (10) Mishap procedures.
> 
> --- Carl



Other related posts: