There are no currently available programs (or popular for that matter) like you speak of. Rocksim Pro is the only viable program I know of unless you can name another that cost less than a grand. TAOS is not popular and has a learning curve that's pretty steep. So I have no Idea what you could be speaking about. There is no question here about CP or flight dynamics. It's about solving a very real problem of software available to solve a very real problem. A way to get certification for a real flight. Monroe > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: [AR] Re: dynamic stability > From: "Troy Prideaux" <GEORDI@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Wed, August 20, 2014 3:31 pm > To: <arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > As I understand it, most of the currently available popular software programs > will provide you with it - how accurate they are for high mach numbers is > anyone's guess. I think it's primary about the shift in the cp over various > mach numbers and the software programs will generally tell you (for most > conventional rockets) that the cp will move forward with increasing mach > numbers which is generally the opposite to conventional fixed wing aircraft. > This cp shift has apparently caught many HPR flyers out who were pushing the > limits of acceleration and velocity flight profiles by transitioning from a > stable configuration to unstable even though the cg generally shifts forward > for typical solid propelled rockets. > > Troy. > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On > >Behalf Of Carl Tedesco > >Sent: Thursday, 21 August 2014 7:46 AM > >To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >Subject: [AR] dynamic stability > > > >I am starting the process for getting a class 3 waiver for a rocket > >launch. Most of the FAA required documentation looks straight forward. > >One piece of information they require is "The dynamic stability > >characteristics for the entire flight profile." A static stability > >analysis is straight-forward, but I have never done a dynamic stability > >analysis. > > > >How have folks on this list addressed this requirement? Is this software > >driven analysis or just hand-calculations? Does anyone have an analysis > >they could share? If software analysis is the norm, can anyone point me > >to affordable software? > > > >--- Carl > > > >-- > >Carl Tedesco > >Flometrics, Inc. > >5900 Sea Lion Place, Suite 150 > >Carlsbad, CA 92010 > >tel: 760-476-2770 ext. 515 > >fax: 760-476-2763 > >ctedesco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >www.flometrics.com