[AR] Re: dynamic stability

  • From: "Monroe L. King Jr." <monroe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 16:27:01 -0700

There are no currently available programs (or popular for that matter)
like you speak of. Rocksim Pro is the only viable program I know of
unless you can name another that cost less than a grand.

TAOS is not popular and has a learning curve that's pretty steep.

So I have no Idea what you could be speaking about. 

There is no question here about CP or flight dynamics. It's about
solving a very real problem of software available to solve a very real
problem. A way to get certification for a real flight.

Monroe

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [AR] Re: dynamic stability
> From: "Troy Prideaux" <GEORDI@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, August 20, 2014 3:31 pm
> To: <arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> As I understand it, most of the currently available popular software programs 
> will provide you with it - how accurate they are for high mach numbers is 
> anyone's guess. I think it's primary about the shift in the cp over various 
> mach numbers and the software programs will generally tell you (for most 
> conventional rockets) that the cp will move forward with increasing mach 
> numbers which is generally the opposite to conventional fixed wing aircraft. 
> This cp shift has apparently caught many HPR flyers out who were pushing the 
> limits of acceleration and velocity flight profiles by transitioning from a 
> stable configuration to unstable even though the cg generally shifts forward 
> for typical solid propelled rockets.
> 
> Troy.
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> >Behalf Of Carl Tedesco
> >Sent: Thursday, 21 August 2014 7:46 AM
> >To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Subject: [AR] dynamic stability
> >
> >I am starting the process for getting a class 3 waiver for a rocket
> >launch. Most of the FAA required documentation looks straight forward.
> >One piece of information they require is "The dynamic stability
> >characteristics for the entire flight profile." A static stability
> >analysis is straight-forward, but I have never done a dynamic stability
> >analysis.
> >
> >How have folks on this list addressed this requirement? Is this software
> >driven analysis or just hand-calculations? Does anyone have an analysis
> >they could share? If software analysis is the norm, can anyone point me
> >to affordable software?
> >
> >--- Carl
> >
> >--
> >Carl Tedesco
> >Flometrics, Inc.
> >5900 Sea Lion Place, Suite 150
> >Carlsbad, CA 92010
> >tel: 760-476-2770 ext. 515
> >fax: 760-476-2763
> >ctedesco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >www.flometrics.com

Other related posts: