Um, it's actually a deity, sir, check your spelling sir. Even your
screen reader should have pronounced it differently. As for Joe's
rhetoric, I am really afraid but I wouldn't ashame myself by lowering
it to such level. If someone is serious about a valuable discussion on
this, please, keep me informed individually.
On 8/14/17, Frank Ventura <frank.ventura@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Naturally occurring forces, chemical reactions, Jedi mind trick? Anything is
possible; but the existance of the universe doesn't by itself prove
involvement by a diety.
Frank
-----Original Message-----
From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bob Evans
Sent: Sunday, August 13, 2017 3:28 PM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: Sunday
Syllogism is deductive reasoning in which a conclusion is derived from two
premises. So rationally, if something has been made, it must then have had a
maker. It could have not made itself, because at first, it didn't ask.
I will theoretically suppose with you, that a deity doesn't exist.
Then how could we rationally construe the perfect design of this universe? I
urge you not to beat around the bush and think before you give an answer.