[opendtv] Re: 200 Mile 8VSB Reception

  • From: Tom Barry <trbarry@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 21:20:33 -0500



Dale Kelly wrote:
> But, lets get on with making VSB work, it's what we have and not what we
> could've had that counts.

At this point I agree! Both ATSC fans and skeptics should ban together right now to ensure nobody in Congress decides to change the 2009 cut off date. After that point at least something different would happen. At the worst, a new administration could blame it on the Republicans. ;-)

Let's shake this loose.

- Tom


John S. wrote:


ATSC still has serious flaws and is still playing catch-up
with DVB-T. Always has been, and it always will be.
DVB-T is infinitely more flexible, extensible,
and adaptable, whereas ATSC gets kludge after kludge
that will never be adopted.


And, that is fact.
After spending a couple of years as a representative at ATSC and watching
the blatant technical gerrymandering by the CE folks, I can say that loudly
and with conviction.
But, lets get on with making VSB work, it's what we have and not what we
could've had that counts.


-----Original Message-----
From: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of John Shutt
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 2:14 PM
To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [opendtv] Re: 200 Mile 8VSB Reception


Bert,

That one report by Jan was one of the Sinclair demonstrations
that was used
to compile the report you quoted.

The DVB-T used was 2K, first generation as well.  If you are
going to assume
that ATSC receivers will get more sensitive over time, you must
make similar
assumptions w/r/t DVB-T receivers as well.

If you think ATSC is good enough, then you are free to end
posting on this
list.  I for one, as a broadcaster, am still not happy with ATSC for more
reasons than just it's performance at Mark's Apartment.  ATSC still has
serious flaws and is still playing catch-up with DVB-T.  Always has been,
and it always will be.  DVB-T is infinitely more flexible,
extensible, and
adaptable, whereas ATSC gets kludge after kludge that will never
be adopted.

Thank you for the lecture, however.

John

----- Original Message -----
From: "Manfredi, Albert E" <albert.e.manfredi@xxxxxxxxxx>


John, I believe in full and honest disclosure. If you mention the
Sinclair tests, then talk about the Sinclair tests. Not someone else's
test.




----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:

- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration
settings at FreeLists.org

- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the
word unsubscribe in the subject line.





----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:

- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word 
unsubscribe in the subject line.



--
Tom Barry                       trbarry@xxxxxxxxxxx     
Find my resume and video filters at www.trbarry.com


----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:

- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word 
unsubscribe in the subject line.

Other related posts: