John Golitsis wrote: >Which fits perfectly with the concept of an MMBS (Mobile Multimedia >Broadcast Service) proposed by the CEA in 1999. Not many people >every expected ATSC to fill that roll. Certainly not I. Nor I, nor anyone else that ever designed an ATSC receiver, nor the FCC that 'designed' a DTT network that at best, supports rooftop antenna reception for most of the people most of the time, and indoor reception only for a much lower percentage of the people much less of the time. Note that the MMBS system as proposed by CEA in 1999 was going to use OFDM. Notice a trend in all this? Wireless broadband = OFDM transmission. Someone earlier made the comment that ATSC is best suited for STL links. To that I would add that someday -- after mandatory widespread proliferation in new TV sets -- it could also become an excellent candidate for single-wire A/V device interconnect, much as NTSC tuners using channel 3 or 4 are today. But it still is and always will be an extremely poor choice for wireless broadband distribution of DTV. -- Frank >> It is extremely unlikely that such portable devices will ever be >> enabled with ATSC receivers, for technical and economic reasons. >> The phrases "low power," "low cost" and "reliable" simply don't >> apply to ATSC receivers, and probably never will. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.