Craig Birkmaier wrote: > Ironically, we may see a system where TV programsd > go direct to consumer first, then when direct sales > taper off, the programs will be edited for content > and filled with commercials for broadcast and cable > network distribution. The only convincing argument that ads can be zapped mercilessly would be to demonstrate that ad revenues are so low as to be in the noise. For the broadcast and the multichannel provider industries, this is not the case. Even if what you claim above ever comes to pass, you would still need to show that the direct sales revenues would be far, far greater than the revenues after the direct sales period. These are very simply different business models, which can perfectly well coexist. No one is forced to watch ads. Just buy the DVD boxed sets of TV shows, if you prefer. If someone were out to replace the radio and TV broadcast industry with a new form of high cost by-subscription-only news and entertainment service, then I might buy into the argument that ad zapping is nothing to worry about. It's patently obvious that if you take away the revenue source from any given industry, that industry won't survive. Duh! However, I certainly would not suggest that Congress should be pushing such a concept on the public. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.