John Shutt wrote: > Al, > > In your estimation, what did the DVB do differently from > the ATSC? Since Al didn't reply, I'll give it a shot. DVB did two things differently, but I don't think either of these were responsible for any measure of greater success in implementing DTT. 1. Similar to the ISO network protocol development effort of the 1990s, they pulled together all interested parties into a big, professional, standards development organization. As opposed to the IETF and their rag-tag approach with Internet Protocols. The former approach is not necessarily more successful, though, as IETF proved over ISO. 2. For DTT, DVB chose COFDM instead of a single-carrier scheme. I don't think cable and satellite are any more successful in Europe than they are here, so I don't think DVB (-C -S) were particularly key in determining success of those media. For DTT, I think the big difference is that the UK, France, and Italy each have *an* organization with the X on its head to develop these terrestrial plants. Whereas here, a lot of competing broadcasters, NOT used to cooperating among each other, are expected to pull together a viable terrestrial system. While they are still battling it out either over analog terrestrial or piggy-backed on other media. (Meaning, their focus is elsewhere.) I am fairly positive that one big improvement in DTT deployment in the USA would be to eliminate the national caps on broadcaster ownership of terrestrial stations. At least then, individual networks would have an incentive to build out viable national terrestrial networks. As things are now, I think it's too fragmented for such a concerted effort. So FCC regs will have to carry it through. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.