It is probably better to undo that non-law now instead of at 2009 approaches, which would almost certainly happen. I was starting to wonder if everyone would just pretend it was a law until the turn-off became immanent and someone challenged to stall some more. - Tom John Willkie wrote: > I did say network, right :-) On that note, I was very sad to hear last > Friday about the demise of Sinclair's News Central due to (I was told by a > non-Sinclair fellow) current economic realities. > > Your equation begs the question, since the FCC tabled consideration of COFDM > until the DTV transition is further along (to be truthful, they might have > meant 'never.') > > I see that liberal 'babe' Joan Claybrook's Public Citizen has filed a lawsuit > on the recent budget "compromise" that appears to be unconstitutional and > which also sets the analog sunset date in 2009. If successful, this suit > will undo what congress did. > > That might create a political peg upon which to hang consideration of COFDM; > certainly the transition will be futher along in three years. What's the > proper "decent interval" to wait > > John Willkie > > -----Original Message----- > >>From: Mark Aitken <maitken@xxxxxxxxxx> >>Sent: Mar 23, 2006 7:33 PM >>To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>Subject: [opendtv] Re: Truthiness 2 >> >>Turns out that political realities ARE engineering realities with the >>process that exists today... So, until there is a change in the >>political realities... >>As I have been saying for quite some time now... "I won't say it on >>OpenDTV, but COFDM has many advantages over 8-VSB; however I have to >>make a business with 8-VSB." >> >>Oh, wait a minute, did I just say that?... or was it someone else? Oh >>yeah, that's right, what _*/I/*_ meant to say was... "I've already said >>it many times (not lurking) on OpenDTV, COFDM has many advantages over >>8-VSB; however I have to make a business with 8-VSB." >> >>;^) >> >>John Willkie wrote: >> >> >>>Unlike some, they're too busy to sit around and blow smoke about what >>>"could" or even "should" have been. Take out the "blowing smoke" and you >>>have Sinclair's position; but then one has to contemplate the political, as >>>opposed to engineering, realities. >>> >>>John Willkie >>> >>> >> >>-- >> >>><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> >> >>Regards, >>Mark A. Aitken >>Director, Advanced Technology >><>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< >>=================================== >>Sinclair Broadcast Group >>10706 Beaver Dam Road >>Hunt Valley, MD 21030 >>=================================== >>"There is nothing so likely to produce peace >>as to be well prepared to meet the enemy." >> >>~ ~ ~ ~ ~ George Washington ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ >>=================================== >>Business TEL: (410) 568-1535 >>Business MOBILE: (443) 677-4425 >>Business FAX: (410) 568-1580 >>E-mail: maitken@xxxxxxxxxx >>Text PAGE: page.maitken@xxxxxxxxxx >>HTML PAGE: 4436774425@xxxxxxxxxx >>www.newscentral.tv >>www.sbgi.net >>=================================== >> >> >> >> >> >>---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: >> >>- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at >>FreeLists.org >> >>- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word >>unsubscribe in the subject line. >> > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: > > - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at > FreeLists.org > > - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word > unsubscribe in the subject line. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.