On 25/11/2010 18:17, Ingo Kloecker wrote:
On Thursday 25 November 2010, Jonathan Blake wrote:On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Ingo Kloecker <projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On Wednesday 24 November 2010, Jonathan Blake wrote:I was thinking about listing it as: View standard · simple · simplerI'm not sure about "simple" and "simpler". Sure, the HTML is really simple(r), but the one page editions are huge in terms of size of the download for this single page. The illustrated version weighs in at 5.2 MB. This could be rather surprising for somebody expecting something simple. Also, it is probably not suitable for people without an all- inclusive data traffic contract for their mobile. I suggest something like "single page" and "single page illustrated (5.2 MB)".That makes a lot of sense, though I think "simple" and "simpler" are good pithy descriptions. You got me thinking (yikes!) and I mocked up a radical departure from how we've formatted the pages before (now that I'm almost finished streamlining the pages according to the old-new format). http://www.projectaon.org/en/Jon/RuneWar What do you think?I like it. I'd probably flushleft the "view" header. Or simply leave it out entirely.
Maybe 'view' -> 'view online'? -- Simon Osborne Project Aon ~~~~~~ Manage your subscription at http://www.freelists.org/list/projectaon