[projectaon] Re: Illustrated single-page format?
- From: Jonathan Blake <jonathan.blake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 15:05:00 -0800
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Ingo Kloecker
<projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 November 2010, Jonathan Blake wrote:
>> I was thinking about listing it as:
>>
>> View standard · simple · simpler
>
> I'm not sure about "simple" and "simpler". Sure, the HTML is really
> simple(r), but the one page editions are huge in terms of size of the
> download for this single page. The illustrated version weighs in at 5.2
> MB. This could be rather surprising for somebody expecting something
> simple. Also, it is probably not suitable for people without an all-
> inclusive data traffic contract for their mobile.
>
> I suggest something like "single page" and "single page illustrated (5.2
> MB)".
That makes a lot of sense, though I think "simple" and "simpler" are
good pithy descriptions. You got me thinking (yikes!) and I mocked up
a radical departure from how we've formatted the pages before (now
that I'm almost finished streamlining the pages according to the
old-new format).
http://www.projectaon.org/en/Jon/RuneWar
What do you think?
--
Jon
~~~~~~
Manage your subscription at http://www.freelists.org/list/projectaon
Other related posts: