[projectaon] Re: New Order Grand Weaponmastery text
- From: Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:05:54 +0100
Ingo Kloecker wrote:
On Friday 29 August 2008, Simon Osborne wrote:
[snip]
I fully agree with your interpretation in this matter. But: Is this
clarification really necessary? I think Joe's intention is pretty
obvious. If a reader decides to go for the non-obvious alternative then
he's obviously trying to cheat by finding loopholes in the rules.
Further to the previous mail, I actually don't think Joe's intention is all that
obvious here! It could have been worded in a much better, less ambiguous way.
I've never looked too closely at the NO rules before the last few months, so
I've never noticed this ambiguity before.
Anyway, if you want to reword it then my proposal (which, me being not a
native speaker, might be totally wrong) would be:
"For every adventure that you complete successfully in the New Order
series [possessing/knowing/mastering/having the discipline of Grand
Weaponmastery], you will gain proficiency with one additional weapon."
That's much better than my proposal, sure. Cheers! Escalated to Jon.
--
Simon Osborne
Project Aon
~~~~~~
Manage your subscription at http://www.freelists.org/list/projectaon
Other related posts: