On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Iain Smith <iainsmith@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Is there a visual difference to the quality between JPG and PNG in this > case? We could always offer the option of a separate download for those who > would prefer a copy of the higher detailed map. There should be. JPEG creates wavy lines and other odd artifacts in the images. They're most notable around the lettering on the maps. Anyway, your idea is a worthy one. I've put it on my "someday maybe" list, unless some go-get-em XSL developer wants to make another transformation. :) -- Jon ~~~~~~ Manage your subscription at http://www.freelists.org/list/projectaon