Re: [yoshimi-user] 0.062-pre0

  • From: Will J Godfrey <WillGodfrey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: yoshimi-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 21:20:16 +0100

On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 17:36:46 +0200
Jeremy Jongepier <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 10/16/2010 05:30 PM, cal wrote:
On 17/10/10 02:25, Jeremy Jongepier wrote:
On 10/16/2010 05:20 PM, cal wrote:
A simpler approach might be to assign and document a static table of
the mappings of enabled synth controls to their assigned midi control
messages?

Hello Cal,

I'll see if I can produce such a static table that follows the GM spec
as close as possible.

I've had a good look through the spec. I think that given the nature of
the as yet largely unidentified controls, tagging them to carefully
considered choices from the Undefined ranges might be ok?

cheers.


Yup, that's what I exactly had in mind. Some effects could be mapped to
defined CC messages though.

Best,

Jeremy

Sounds like a good idea to me.

--
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.


Other related posts: