On 10/04/11 22:31, Adam Huffman wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 1:24 PM, cal<cal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10/04/11 22:13, Adam Huffman wrote:Cal,
[ ... ]
One thing that's come up is that different parts of the source have
different licences (see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694994#c3).
[ ... ]
[ ... ]
Am I wrong?
As I understand it, if the licence is strictly GPLv2 only (not GPLv2
or later), that's not compatible with GPLv3 in the same program.
See:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#v2v3Compatibility