[AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?

  • From: kevin ward <kevinward46@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 00:17:51 -0400

Ap\htpb\+al (294isp, 70\13\12 ?)

I'm asking for any and all stats re open rocket

Ty kindly

On Fri, Apr 28, 2023, 12:15 AM roxanna Mason <rocketmaster.ken@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Yes, and why the "manned" emphasis.
Solids are without doubt best suited for sub launched missiles, which the
Russians learned the hard way.

Ken

On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 9:09 PM Troy Prideaux <troy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

ICBMs and large missiles will typically be solid in all likelihood though.



Troy



*From:* arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> *On
Behalf Of *roxanna Mason
*Sent:* Friday, April 28, 2023 1:56 PM
*To:* arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?



Maybe it's just wishful thinking but if level heads prevail and push
politics aside, eventually all large boosters will be liquid,

at least for man rated vehicles..



Ken



On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 8:25 PM Troy Prideaux <troy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Yeah, much has changed *in general industry* since then with static mixing
becoming more and more common. It might be only a matter of time before
the
technology works through to the larger solids although it's far from a
given.

Troy


Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. arocket
  3. Archive
  4. 04-2023