[AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?
- From: "Bruno Berger" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ("bruno.berger")
- To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 09:28:01 +0200
Yes, Flugwerft Schleissheim is a nice museum. The main museum in
Munich city has also some nice artifacts. The exhibition has been
renovated lately, not to the good though in my opinion.
The two engines of Europa's first stage are indeed Atlas engines
build in license by Rolls Royce (The outside ones, not the central
sustainer).
Bruno
Am 28.04.2023 um 07:53 schrieb Ben
Brockert:
Photos below:
The “Deutsches Museum Flugwerft Schleißheim” outside Munich
is mostly an aircraft museum, but has a few interesting rocket
parts at the very end. One is an Ariane 5 motor casing that has
been cross sectioned, it was the 7 segment version. I placed a 1
euro coin on it for scale, 23.25mm/0.915in in diameter.
According to the plaque, the sections were held together by a
“clevis-tang joint” with 180 pins, and that they were formed on
a “counterroller flow-turning machine” from a 58mm thick blank.
They also have a nearly complete Europa rocket, which you
can practically climb inside of. Not a particularly successful
program, but still interesting to see the hardware up close.
You definitely get the feeling that the Blue Streak first
stage builders got a real good look at an Atlas at some
point.
The museum is easily reached by a 20 minute train ride from
Munich and a 1.5km walk that goes through the local palace
grounds, no need to have a car.
On Friday, April 28, 2023, Henry Spencer <hspencer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Fri, 28
Apr 2023, John Dom wrote:
Ariane 5 APCP boosters have been unsegmented. Cast in one
piece. Saw the vertical casting setup in France which
proved big...
Sure you're not thinking of the P80 first stage for Vega?
The Ariane 5 boosters are segmented -- three segments,
joined at the launch site (originally bolted together,
although midway through the program I believe they switched
to welding them together). Vega's P80 is basically a single
Ariane 5 segment, although with a composite casing instead
of a steel one, and for quite a while it was the world's
largest (operational) unsegmented solid motor.
I do not know about coming Ariane 6's fabrication details.
Nor about their internal geometries.
The Ariane 6 solids are identical to the P120C enlarged
first stage built for the Vega C upgrade of Vega (and since
it flew last summer, it now holds the largest-unsegmented
record).
The Shuttle boosters were segmented for ship
transportation (size!) I read at the time.
Not ship, rail -- an SRB segment is about the largest load
that can be carried on the US rail network. (Long ago I
visited the Cape, and while going from one place to another
nearby, happened to see a railroad siding full of the
special railcars used to carry the SRB segments. They
looked like tank cars at first glance, until you noticed the
NASA logos and the labels...)
Henry
Other related posts:
- » [AR] APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- Terry McCreary
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- roxanna Mason
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- kevin ward
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- kevin ward
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- kevin ward
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- Terry McCreary
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- John DeMar
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- David Summers
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- kevin ward
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- kevin ward
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- kevin ward
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- kevin ward
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- kevin ward
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- kevin ward
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- kevin ward
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- Matthew JL
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- George Herbert
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- kevin ward
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- kevin ward
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- roxanna Mason
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- jake
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- roxanna Mason
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- Henry Spencer
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- Henry Spencer
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- Troy Prideaux
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- John Dom
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- roxanna Mason
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- roxanna Mason
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- Henry Spencer
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- Henry Spencer
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- Henry Spencer
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- Troy Prideaux
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- roxanna Mason
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- roxanna Mason
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- Troy Prideaux
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- Henry Spencer
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- roxanna Mason
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- roxanna Mason
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- Troy Prideaux
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- Ben Brockert