[AR] Re: Freeman Dyson, RIP
- From: Henry Spencer <hspencer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: arocket <arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 16:54:27 -0500 (EST)
On Tue, 3 Mar 2020, David Summers wrote:
...So it is fairly obvious that you could make a bunch of "fixed" solar
sail like structures in a sphere around the sun...
If you can get total mass down to about 1.5g/m^2, which is what sunlight
will support at 1AU. That's challenging -- the Team Encounter sail
design, circa 20 years ago, was aiming for 3.63g/m^2 (including structure
and a minimal payload), and that was a very aggressive design, much
lighter than anything actually built so far. The fundamental limits are
much lower, but approaching them is not easy, especially if you want a
substantial payload.
Now for the fun part:
All those mirrors around the sun would be internally reflecting most of
the energy - which would greatly increase the internal energy of the
system. So you'd get much more power out of your solar cells. But then
there is the downside: it probably eventually makes the sun go nova, by
runaway heating. Unless you really can extract most of the energy in
solar cells! ;-}
Well, the Sun wouldn't literally go nova -- novas are now known to involve
a double-star system with one star a white dwarf, they don't happen to
isolated main-sequence stars -- but having most of its output reflected
back into it definitely wouldn't be good. :-)
At the cost of having only half the thrust, your sails can be black
instead of reflective. You're still radiating thermal infrared back at
the Sun, but only half as much because you're also radiating from the
starward side. Good solar cells are actually pretty close to black,
although it's not clear that you can make them thin enough for this.
Actually, what you want on the sunward side is something that absorbs most
of the visible but doesn't emit much thermal IR (with an IR-emitter
surface on the starward side). Again there's a question of whether you
can make a suitable material thin enough, but it might be possible.
Doesn't sound like a good way to support substantial payloads, though.
Henry
Other related posts:
- » [AR] Freeman Dyson, RIP- John Dom
- » [AR] Re: Freeman Dyson, RIP- roxanna Mason
- » [AR] Re: Freeman Dyson, RIP- Rand Simberg
- » [AR] Re: Freeman Dyson, RIP- Edward Wright
- » [AR] Re: Freeman Dyson, RIP- William Claybaugh
- » [AR] Re: Freeman Dyson, RIP- Henry Spencer
- » [AR] Re: Freeman Dyson, RIP- Rand Simberg
- » [AR] Re: Freeman Dyson, RIP- Henry Spencer
- » [AR] Re: Freeman Dyson, RIP- William Claybaugh
- » [AR] Re: Freeman Dyson, RIP- roxanna Mason
- » [AR] Re: Freeman Dyson, RIP- Henry Spencer
- » [AR] Re: Freeman Dyson, RIP- David Summers
- » [AR] Re: Freeman Dyson, RIP- William Claybaugh
- » [AR] Re: Freeman Dyson, RIP- Rand Simberg
- » [AR] Re: Freeman Dyson, RIP- David Summers
- » [AR] Re: Freeman Dyson, RIP - Henry Spencer
- » [AR] Re: Freeman Dyson, RIP- John Stoffel
- » [AR] Re: Freeman Dyson, RIP- David Summers
- » [AR] Re: Freeman Dyson, RIP- Peter Fairbrother
- » [AR] Re: Freeman Dyson, RIP- JOHN HALPENNY
- » [AR] Re: Freeman Dyson, RIP- Henry Spencer
- » [AR] Re: Freeman Dyson, RIP- Uwe Klein
- » [AR] Re: Freeman Dyson, RIP- Keith Henson
- » [AR] Re: Freeman Dyson, RIP- Henry Spencer
- » [AR] Re: Freeman Dyson, RIP- David Summers
- » [AR] Re: Freeman Dyson, RIP- Henry Spencer
- » [AR] Re: Freeman Dyson, RIP- Uwe Klein
- » [AR] Re: Freeman Dyson, RIP- Uwe Klein
- » [AR] Re: Freeman Dyson, RIP- Henry Spencer
- » [AR] Re: Freeman Dyson, RIP- Keith Henson
- » [AR] Re: Freeman Dyson, RIP- Henry Spencer
- » [AR] Re: Freeman Dyson, RIP- Norman Yarvin
- » [AR] Re: Freeman Dyson, RIP- ken mason
- » [AR] Re: Freeman Dyson, RIP- Henry Spencer
- » [AR] Re: Freeman Dyson, RIP- Marcus D. Leech
- » [AR] Re: Freeman Dyson, RIP- Henry Spencer
- » [AR] Re: Freeman Dyson, RIP- Norman Yarvin
- » [AR] Re: Freeman Dyson, RIP- roxanna Mason
- » [AR] Re: Freeman Dyson, RIP- roxanna Mason
- » [AR] Re: Freeman Dyson, RIP- David Summers