[AR] Re: Subject: Re: S-26.500 KNSB Sugar Shot test tomorrow

  • From: "Troy Prideaux" <troy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 08:11:03 +1100

John,
  Yup, can be all sorts of issues from micro voids to larger voids, to
powdery areas, to channels and tunnels or delaminated regions of the casting
often resulting in a penetration of the nominal burn surface.

Troy 

-----Original Message-----
From: arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> On
Behalf
Of John Stoffel
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2023 8:02 AM
To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [AR] Re: Subject: Re: S-26.500 KNSB Sugar Shot test tomorrow

"Troy" == Troy Prideaux <troy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

In composite propellant, 94% theoretical/measured density ratio can
produce burn profile anomalies depending on chamber pressure. Never
really did much analysis of that when I was playing with candy
although I know that 90% and below is definitely concerning.

Is that because the lower density leads to voids which would increase the
burn
area in a random way, driving pressure spikes?



Other related posts: