[AR] Re: shuttle SRBs (was Re: Re: Phenolic regression rate)

  • From: John Schilling <john.schilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 18:41:38 -0800

On 2/7/2018 9:47 AM, William Claybaugh wrote:

Henry:

You do seem very fond of this “...but failures can be catastrophic” line.  However, what happens to the rockets after the escape system activates is *irrelevant* to crew safety.

Except for the cases where the escape system itself is what endangers the crew.  And then there's the cases where the escape system doesn't activate and you've got no other option.

Escape systems that can escape all or all-minus-epsilon of the failure modes of large solid rocket motors, are not going to be low-risk items from a reliability or safety standpoint.  And the ability to quietly turn off the propulsion system of a launch vehicle, rather than having range safety blow it up, may facilitate abort modes other than sudden bursts of 15-g rocket thrust (from rockets that might themselves fail catastrophically).   Save the LES, or at least the hard-mode LES, for the times when you absolutely can't live without it.

        John Schilling
        john.schilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
        (661) 718-0955

Other related posts: